首页> 外文OA文献 >Willingness to Pay and QALYs: What Can We Learn about Valuing Foodborne Risk?
【2h】

Willingness to Pay and QALYs: What Can We Learn about Valuing Foodborne Risk?

机译:支付意愿和QaLYs:我们可以学到什么来评估食源性风险?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper examines the value of reducing foodborne risk. Previous research on the valuation of health risk has been dominated by the study of mortality risk. However, in most cases foodborne illnesses are non-fatal, so we focus on individuals' preferences for reducing morbidity risk, while also including a realistic, if remote, chance of death. We use a contingent valuation method on a Swedish sample and we estimate a value of a statistical illness consistent with previous findings in the literature. We also examine how willingness to pay (WTP) varies with the expected change in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and estimate the WTP per QALY. We find that WTP increases with, though less than proportionally to, a change in QALYs. However, our results also suggest that respondents may have found it difficult to evaluate compound risks of both morbidity and mortality simultaneously.
机译:本文研究了降低食源性风险的价值。先前关于健康风险评估的研究已被死亡风险研究所主导。但是,在大多数情况下,食源性疾病不是致命的,因此,我们着重于个人降低发病率风险的偏好,同时还包括现实的(即使是微不足道的)死亡机会。我们对瑞典样本使用了或有估值法,并且我们估计了与文献中先前发现相符的统计疾病的价值。我们还研究了支付意愿(WTP)如何随质量调整生命年(QALYs)的预期变化而变化,并估算每个QALY的WTP。我们发现,WTP随QALYs的变化而增加,尽管幅度不大。但是,我们的结果还表明,受访者可能很难同时评估发病率和死亡率的复合风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号